India has a problem that it has been reluctant to discuss publicly for years. The country sits on one of the world's largest coal reserves — enough to last several centuries — and yet it spends hundreds of billions of rupees every year importing energy and chemicals that, in theory, those same coal reserves could produce domestically.
LNG from Qatar. Ammonia from Saudi Arabia. Methanol from Trinidad and Tobago. Urea from Russia. Coking coal from Australia. Year after year, India digs up coal, burns some of it for power, exports a little, and then imports the very chemicals and gases that coal could theoretically produce — at enormous cost to the trade balance, at the mercy of geopolitical disruptions, and at prices set by markets over which India has almost no influence.
On May 13, 2026, the Cabinet decided enough was enough.
THE SCHEME: WHAT THE GOVERNMENT ACTUALLY APPROVED
The Union Cabinet approved a ₹37,500 crore scheme to promote surface coal and lignite gasification projects — aiming to gasify around 75 million tonnes of coal and attract investments of up to ₹3 lakh crore across 25 projects in coal-bearing regions. Financial incentives of up to 20% of the cost of plant and machinery will be provided for new surface coal and lignite gasification projects. The incentive is capped at ₹5,000 crore for any single project, ₹9,000 crore for any single product category, and ₹12,000 crore for any single entity group — disbursed in four equal instalments linked to project milestones.
In a significant accompanying reform, the government extended coal linkage tenure up to 30 years under the gasification sub-sector — providing the kind of long-term policy certainty that large capital investments absolutely require. Projects will be selected through a transparent competitive bidding process — a welcome structural improvement over the opacity that has plagued previous energy sector allocations.
The scheme advances India's national target of gasifying 100 million tonnes of coal by 2030 — a number that sounds abstract until you understand what it means in practice.
WHAT IS COAL GASIFICATION — AND WHY DOES IT MATTER?
Coal gasification is a thermo-chemical process that converts coal or lignite into synthesis gas — syngas — primarily a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Coal or lignite is fed into a gasifier where it reacts with controlled quantities of oxygen and steam under high temperature (700–1,600°C) and elevated pressure. What comes out the other end is not smoke and ash. It is a clean, versatile gas that can be processed into an extraordinary range of industrial products.
Syngas can produce power, fertilisers including urea and ammonia, chemicals including methanol, liquid fuels, and hydrogen. That list is deceptively significant. India currently imports more than 50% of its LNG, almost all of its ammonia, 80–90% of its methanol, and around 20% of its urea. Every one of those products can be made from syngas. Which means every one of those import bills can, in principle, be substantially reduced by gasifying India's own coal.
The key distinction from direct combustion is important: rather than simply releasing energy as heat with high emissions, gasification transforms the carbon-rich material into usable gas with significantly lower direct emissions than traditional coal burning. When coal gasification is combined with Carbon Capture and Storage, the hydrogen produced is classified as Blue Hydrogen — connecting coal gasification directly to India's National Green Hydrogen Mission.
This is not an argument for indefinite coal dependence. It is an argument for using what India has more intelligently, for longer, while the renewable transition matures. And that is a very different proposition.
THE PLAYERS: WHO IS BUILDING INDIA'S GASIFICATION FUTURE
The most important thing to understand about coal gasification in India is that it is not waiting to start. Several major projects are already under construction or in advanced planning — the Cabinet approval accelerates and de-risks a programme that was already moving.
Coal India Limited (CIL) is the anchor of the entire strategy. State-owned Coal India Ltd, which controls approximately 84% of India's coal production, is at the forefront of this initiative, forming joint ventures with other PSUs to set up large-scale gasification plants.
Bharat Coal Gasification & Chemicals Limited (BCGCL) — a joint venture between Coal India and BHEL — is constructing India's first indigenous coal-to-chemical plant in Odisha. This is not a pilot project or a feasibility study. It is a full-scale plant, already under construction, targeting chemicals and syngas production at commercial scale.
A separate Coal India–GAIL joint venture is establishing a project in West Bengal to produce synthetic natural gas, with an investment of over ₹13,000 crore. A Coal India–SAIL joint venture targets syngas production for steelmaking. NLC India plans lignite-to-methanol projects. NTPC is reportedly exploring entry into the coal gasification business.
BHEL brings the engineering and equipment manufacturing capability that makes all of these projects viable domestically. Its indigenous gasification technology — developed at facilities in Hyderabad and Trichy — is central to the government's goal of reducing reliance on foreign EPC contractors. Thermax and IIT Delhi are also involved in developing India's indigenous gasification technology base. GAIL is the gas distribution backbone — the company that will carry syngas and synthetic natural gas to industrial customers and eventually into the city gas distribution network once volumes are sufficient.
NTPC and NLC India round out the public sector picture — both bringing significant project execution capabilities and energy sector experience to what will eventually be a multi-company, multi-site national programme.
On the private sector side, the scheme is technology-agnostic and encourages the adoption of indigenous technologies — meaning private sector companies with proprietary gasification technology or downstream chemical capabilities can participate through the competitive bidding process. Reliance Industries, Adani Enterprises, and several chemical conglomerates are all understood to be evaluating opportunities in the space.
THE ECONOMIC CASE: HOW THIS HELPS INDIA
The economic argument for coal gasification is more compelling than most people appreciate — because it operates simultaneously on several dimensions:
Import substitution at massive scale
India currently imports more than 50% of its LNG, around 20% of its urea, almost entirely all of its ammonia, and 80–90% of its methanol. Domestic syngas production would replace these imports with domestically produced alternatives — improving the trade balance, reducing forex outflows, and insulating industrial supply chains from geopolitical shocks. The West Asia conflict, which disrupted LNG supply routes and pushed prices sharply higher in early 2026, is the most recent reminder of exactly why this matters.
Revenue to government
Coal and lignite utilisation under the scheme is expected to generate ₹6,300 crore annually in revenue from the targeted 75 million tonnes of gasification, in addition to GST and other levies from downstream products. The government is not just spending ₹37,500 crore — it is creating a revenue-generating industrial ecosystem that pays back over time.
Jobs in coal-bearing regions
The scheme is expected to create around 50,000 direct and indirect jobs across 25 projects in coal-bearing regions. These are the regions — Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal — that have historically been economically dependent on mining employment and have faced the sharpest disruptions as the energy transition has progressed. Gasification plants create high-skill, high-wage manufacturing jobs in exactly the communities that need them most.
Building a domestic technology ecosystem
The government's explicit preference for indigenous technology — developed by BHEL, Thermax, and India's academic institutions — means the scheme is not just buying a solution from abroad. It is building India's own gasification technology capability, which can eventually be exported to other coal-dependent developing economies facing the same challenge.
THE COST COMPARISON: IS IT ACTUALLY CHEAPER?
This is the question that every serious analyst of the sector asks first — and the honest answer is nuanced.
Syngas from coal gasification is not unconditionally cheaper than imported alternatives. At current LNG prices and with current gasification technology costs, the economics are roughly competitive in some product categories and more challenging in others. That is precisely why the government's 20% capital subsidy on plant and machinery exists — to bridge the viability gap and make projects financially attractive during the period when the technology is still scaling and costs are still reducing.
The more compelling cost argument is the volatility argument, not the absolute price argument. Imported LNG prices swung from $3 per MMBtu in 2020 to over $70 in the 2022 European energy crisis. Indian coal prices, by contrast, are administratively determined and stable — and India has enough of it to last centuries. For industries that need predictable input costs — fertiliser manufacturers, chemical companies, steel producers — the stability of domestic coal gasification has an economic value that goes well beyond the spot price comparison.
The programme aims to build a low-carbon chemicals and fertiliser economy potentially worth ₹60,000–90,000 crore annually through import substitution alone. Even at the bottom of that range, the economic case for gasification is powerful.
WHAT TO WATCH: THE MILESTONES THAT MATTER
BCGCL's Odisha plant commissioning
The Coal India–BHEL joint venture plant in Odisha is the first indigenous coal-to-chemical plant in India's history. Its commissioning timeline — currently targeted for the near term — is the most important near-term milestone in the entire programme. Success here validates the technology, the economics, and the entire thesis.
Competitive bid outcomes
The transparent bidding process for the 25 projects will reveal which private sector players — Reliance, Adani, major chemical companies — are prepared to back the programme with their own capital alongside the government subsidy.
Coal linkage auction participation
The 30-year coal linkage tenure is genuinely transformative for project economics. Watch whether this drives significantly higher participation in the next round of NRS linkage auctions.
Technology localisation pace
The government's push for indigenous technology is partly aspirational today — most large-scale gasification projects still require significant imported equipment. Watch how quickly BHEL and Thermax can close that gap and what share of project costs can be met domestically within three to five years.
THE BIGGER PICTURE
India holds approximately 401 billion tonnes of coal reserves and 47 billion tonnes of lignite — among the world's largest. Coal accounts for over 55% of the country's energy mix. That reality is not going to change within this decade, regardless of how aggressively renewable energy is built out. The coal is there. The question has never been whether India will use it — it will. The question is how intelligently it chooses to do so.
Gasification is the most intelligent answer currently available. It produces less direct emissions than combustion. It creates higher-value products than electricity alone. It replaces imports that cost India hundreds of billions of rupees every year. And it builds industrial infrastructure in the regions that need it most.
The ₹37,500 crore scheme is not a climate policy. It is an industrial policy, an energy security policy, and an import substitution policy all rolled into one. In a world where geopolitical disruptions to energy supply chains have become the norm rather than the exception, that combination of rationales makes it one of the most strategically sound investments the government has made in the resources sector in a generation.
India has the coal. Now it has the policy. The only question remaining is execution.
